The form
that impinges on the eye is made of Four Great Elements known as Sathara Mahabhutha
. These Elements or Mhabhutha do not pose as they are but appear in
disguise hence are called ‘Bhutha’, meaning ‘spirit’. What is seen by the eye
is described in the script as ‘Upadaya Rupa’ meaning, a shape formed by
the Four Great elements when conditions are present. An example given is the image (or shadow)
falling on water when one looks into a pond. We cannot interact with this image
by touching or smelling and it appears when we look into the water and
disappears when we move away. If we try to touch it we can feel the water but
not the image. There is no difference to this experience, it is said, to what
we experience in our day to day encounters with external objects.
The dilemma is that we tend to tie such a visual experience to an experience from another sense door, such as smell, taste, touch etc., which in reality occur in isolation of each other. By tying one experience to the others we compose a person or a thing in our mind as one that exist permanently out there and hence we come back in search of him/it to experience or re-cognise (forming prathisandhi vinnana or Re-link consciousness).
The dilemma is that we tend to tie such a visual experience to an experience from another sense door, such as smell, taste, touch etc., which in reality occur in isolation of each other. By tying one experience to the others we compose a person or a thing in our mind as one that exist permanently out there and hence we come back in search of him/it to experience or re-cognise (forming prathisandhi vinnana or Re-link consciousness).
This can be
compared with conventional film making where visual footage is shot first and
voices and music dubbed in afterwords to create a motion picture. A mental impression of either of our experiences
through a sense door is sufficient to make us comeback in search of the object
(image) to which it is attached to (in our mind) and when seen again the film
(or the video) is played back experiencing through several senses. This is how we are trapped in this samsaric
existence.
Furthermore,
according to the teachings, consciousness that arises in the visual experience,
chakku Vinnana, is different to the consciousness that arise through an
experience from ear, nose, tongue or body. Therefore, the experiences from two
or more sense bases are distinct by nature and hence cannot be identified with
one object.
The Buddha identified
this error and preached to refrain from tying experience from one sense door to
another. In his response to a request from a ascetic named Bahiya to teach
dhamma, the enlightened one simply advised,
“Bāhiya, you should
train yourself thus: in the seen will be merely what is seen; in the
heard will be merely what is heard; in the sensed will be merely what is sensed; in the
cognised will be merely what is cognised. “
“Ditte Ditta Mattan Bhavissathi ,
Suthe Sutha Mattan Bhavissathi,
Muthe Mutha Mattan Bhavissathi,
Vinnate Vinnatha mattan Bhavissathi”
It is said that Bhahiya became
an Arhat having listened to this sermon.
The meaning
of this profound statement in simple terms is, do not combine an experience
from the eye, for instance, to another as they arise within each sense base and
cease from within without any interconnection.
In a similar manner we also confuse visual appearance of sense bases
with their actual function. The Buddha has said that we cannot see our sense
bases (anidassana). Though we identify them as eye, ear, nose, tongue or
the body, the sense bases are identified by their function rather than the
physical appearance. Being ignorant of the function of each in contact, for
instance we combine the visual appearance of the ear to the function of
hearing.
This can be
explained with a simple experiment. If you prick your tongue with a pin the
resultant sensation is due to arising of the body consciousness and not the
tongue consciousness as it meant to be.
When there is a pain in the leg as long as you grasp it as a leg pain it will prevail. The truth is that the sensation/pain felt due to arising of body consciousness is tied to the eye consciousness and grasped it as a pain occurring in the leg. In this instance the body consciousness arises and ceases momentarily corresponding to the arising and ceasing of the body contact. However, we do not feel the gap in between (the moment without any pain) as the sensation (pain) is retrieved by the mind as mind consciousness in bridging the gap, hence we feel a continuous pain. Now as we attach the body pain to the visual experience we complain of suffering from leg pain.
Take an example of you being insulted by someone, you usually get hurt in such situations and often react, as you can connect what you heard to the person seen. If the person is someone you hate the reaction is multiplied. However, if you just consider what you heard as just a voice you will not feel hurt. Learning from the teachings we should consider it as something just heard without connecting to a person and moreover, if there is no listener there is no one to be hurt.
Observing
this reality with insight helps to separate the experiences sensed through different
sense doors lessening the power of defilements. The realisation that
an experience from each sense door arises due to conditions and cease when the
conditions are not present is central to the above.